|
By Sharon Kufeldt and Gail Sredanovic
The joys and relaxation of
summer vacation come with
some extra safety concerns for parents. One you may not have considered
is the
presence of military recruiters looking to meet their quotas with your
children. During the school year, recruiters are a heavy presence on
campus,
with games, small gifts and other inducements, military aptitude tests
and a
database that includes information on children as young as 16.
However, they do not stop their
efforts during school
vacation. They are present where children gather, especially targeting
youth of
color and low-income youth.
Earlier this month, responding to an ACLU report on
recruiter abuses, the
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child issued a report
urging the U.S.
to make
sweeping policy changes regarding domestic military recruitment
practices.
Although the U.S. signed the U.N.'s Optional Protocol on
the involvement of
Children in Armed Conflict in 2002, military recruiters still target
children
under 18 years of age for enlistment with techniques that include false
promises and coercion.
Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU Human Rights Program,
said that "to
claim the high moral ground and assert leadership on the issue of human
rights,
the U.S.
must take vigorous action to bring its current conduct in line with the
committee's recommendations." The recommended changes that we fully
support include the following:
The U.S.
government must closely monitor domestic military recruiters and
investigate
and punish misconduct by recruiters.
It must ensure that military recruitment does not
particularly target racial
and ethnic minorities and children of low income families.
Furthermore, the No Child Left Behind Act must be
amended to protect
students' privacy rights and the rights of parents and legal guardians.
Any
child currently signed up under the Delayed Enlistment Program must be
adequately informed of their right to withdraw from enlistment.
Perhaps most important to put the U.S.
in compliance with the
protocol is to raise the minimum age for recruitment to 18.
This summer you may see members of the Raging Grannies
Action League as we
continue our public information campaign to reach children and parents
with
facts about military enlistment.
Meanwhile, it is up to parents to make themselves
informed and know who is
influencing their child. Should your student come home with a military
contract, be sure to read carefully both sides of any document he or
she may
sign.
The enlistment contract is cleverly formatted to
disguise that although it
is binding on the recruit, nothing in it is actually binding on the
military.
Sharon
Kufeldt is national vice president of Veterans
for Peace and a veteran of the U.S. Air Force. Both she and Gail
Sredanovic
are members of the Raging Grannies Action League.
Tama Adelman: Army combat nurse in Vietnam.
My name is Tama. And I'm just a regular, middle-class working single
mom. I was raised in this city. In the late '60s, I joined the Army as
an Army nurse, thinking I was doing the right thing, thinking I was
going to be of service. I was 21 when I went to Vietnam.
Those 12 months defined who I am today. Thirty-six years
later, it is with me like it was yesterday: the sadness, the tears, the
depression, the smells. I carry that war in a very private place. But
what is happening today, by my country, requires that I bring my very
private pain to a very public arena.
Maybe had I not spent my year patching the wounded or
bagging the dead, I wouldn't believe so strongly. Maybe if I didn't
have an 18-year-old son, I wouldn't feel so strongly about the damage
we're inflicting on the next generation of young men and women, who
have been asked to go to war and possibly sacrifice their life -- and
if not their life, certainly their soul.
Maybe if I hadn't seen the devastation of a country and
the permanent damage to a people and a land, I wouldn't believe so
strongly. But I have seen, and I do believe what our government is
doing is morally wrong.
I see every person, whether Iraqi or American, as some
mother's son or daughter. And since I would die to protect my own son,
I am morally obligated to speak out against this egregious use of power
by our country.
In Vietnam, our mission was to win their hearts and
minds. Today I say hearts and minds can't be won through violence. This
is a sad time for those of us who see the great potential in this
experiment called a democracy. Yet we must weep at our inability to
take this potential greatness and translate it into solutions other
than war.
And I have to say, I'm confused and I have no answers.
What is the message we're sending to our kids about conflict
resolution? And what does it really look like when it says I support
the troops but I don't support the war? I struggle to understand.
But what I do know with certainty is my own experience
with war. I have seen firsthand not only the futility of the violence,
but the devastation it brings to lives and countries. And it seems
ironic, with all our accomplishments, from landing on the moon to
mapping the human genome, that we still haven't learned how to resolve
conflict without war.
How far have we come in these years? I ask each of you,
will those people in harm's way today, both Iraqi and American, look
back in the rear-view mirror, 36 years from now, and face the same pain
that I feel today? I fear that answer. Thank you.
|